In the previous section, we have seen that in the off-CELI collisions a new type of motion is being generated: the Spin. And, as we have seen from the study of spinolons, one of the most remarkable property of the Spin is its ability to keep a spinning XF-mass in the xenovoid (XV) space --the HOS from spilling out and returning to its default XB-state.

In the off-CELI collisions presented, we considered that the collisions that take place are between XB-blocks. A far rarer occurrences that can take place in an off-CELI collision is not between two XB-blocks, but between one XB-block and one PD-block (each from different MOLIs). An even rarer occurrence is the one between two PD-blocks (each from different MOLIs). Let us magnify the picture of those rare collisions before begin examining them.

When two XB-blocks are involved in a head-on linear collision, they will unite (SUCO) generating a XF-mass called a PD (protodense) mass. That XF-PD then, by the renormalization property of XF (RENO), will begin to decompress transforming it into two adjoining XB-masses (DUB).

The rare off-CELI collisions that we are interested in studying is when one XF-PRODE from one MOLI, upon its formation, is being hit by a XB-block or by another XF PD from another MOLI. That type of rare collisions will generate spinning XF-masses, called spinons (SP), in the XV-space so let us study such a XF-mass which, upon its formation, has acquired a spin.

 

A Study of a xenofluid (XF) mass acquiring a spin upon its formation in the XV-space

Let XF_V be a newly born XF-mass of a volume V whose mass is xenofluid (XF) of a constant density greater than the one of the thin xenofluid (tXF). We called such a newly formed XF-mass a spinon (SP) that is different from a spinolon (SL) only in terms that its mass XF-density is greater than that of the spinolon.

We want to see how that spin is going to shape up and transform that newly born spinon XF_V and thus to see its evolution and transformation in the xenovoid (XV) space.

As already noted in the study of a spinolon, there are two, and only two, tendencies at work:

one, springing from the formation of a XF-mass and vested in its renormalization tendency, RXF; the other, springing from the spin and vested in the generated inertial centrifugal tendency TCF.

Because of the constant XF-density of the newly born XF_V-mass, it follows that R_XF is constant throughout the entire XF_V-mass. However, for T_CF we have no longer constancy in XF_V as derived in the previous section where it was shown that the magnitude of T_CF increases linearly with the distance from AOS. So the variation in the net tendency (NT) is provided entirely by the variation of T_CF.

Unlike for the spinolon (SL) where everywhere outside its AOS the T_CF is the dominant tendency, in here, for the spinon (SP) that is no longer the case. In fact, depending of the initial conditions (ICs) at birth for the XF_V, these two basic situations or scenarios can exist:

a) RXF>TCF, for the entire mass of XFV , or b) There is a zone in XFV around AOS of radius forming a (virtual) cylinder of radius where RXF(r)>TCF(r) for r< outside of which TCF(r)>RXF(r) for r>.

In case a), T_CF, by being overpowered by R_XF, will not be able to manifest its existence and preserve the spinon's initial volume V. As such, R_XF will begin dictating that the volume of XF_V to expand and to continue to spin. The latter is because R_XF will act also as the required centripetal force F_CP needed for the spin to continue with its existence.

As that

oblate ellipsoid

expansion takes place, the XF-densty of XF_V will decrease generating therefore a decrease in the magnitude of R_XF. As that process continues, the surface points furthest away from AOS, called surface distant surface (dS) points (dS-points), will be the first where the magnitude of T_CF will first equal and then exceed that of R_XF. At that moment, a developmental phase (DePh) begins to shape up the newly born XF_V. Those DS-points, by the inertial tendency T_CF, will become the dominant ones pushing outwards the XF_V's surface transforming it into a XB-surface that eventually will become a tensioned XB (tXB) surface in the shape of an oblate ellipsoid. That is the 1st Transformation (TR₁) which takes place in the XF_V's DePh (developmental phase) that is similar to the TR₁ obtained for the spinolon.

With the formation of a tXB (tensioned xenobase) surface for the developing spinon (XF_V), its XF-mass can no longer expand being locked-in within its surrounding non-stretchable surface. In that XF-mass, we continue to assume for this case that the dominant tendency remain that of R_XF. And if that XF-mass contains holeons in it, then they --through shrinkage-- will increase their surface density and could transform into minitrons provided that the density of the existing XF-mass is high enough to allow the holeons to continue with their shrinkages until their surfaces become xenorigid (XR) surfaces. Now because the minitrons were formed through the shrinkage of holeons, it follows that the XF-density of the spinon has been decreased. That decrease in the overall density of the spinon's XF-mass, could generate the case b) which is significantly different because of the direct input of the inertial centrifugal tendency T_CF.

In case b), the situation is considerably more complex.

The distant surface points furthest away from AOS --the dPs, will be the first points where the influence of T_CF will manifest its existence. As a result of that influence, the dPs, by moving away from AOS, will be stretching the spinon's surface until it becomes a tXB (tensioned xenobase). That is the 1st Transformation (TR₁) in the spinon's DePh (developmental phase).

The 2nd Transformation (TR₂) will take place in the layer just beneath the spinon's tensioned XB-surface to be labeled as L₁. There, on L₂ , in its furthest distant points from AOS, called distant layer points (DL-points), the T_CF will push those points into the non-stretchable surface L₁ until the point-density of those DL points will increase that much that an equilibrium between R_XF and T_CF is being established (R_XF=T_CF). As that is done, R_XF that is dispersive will force that high density DL-points to decompress along the L₂-layer. Thus, as a result of that, the equilibrium R_XF=T_CF will be brocken and a new process begin towards restoring that equilibrium. A perpetual cyclical process of formation and self-destruction of the equilibrium R_XF=T_CF will take place in the form of a whirl. A cyclical XF-flow will take place in the layer L₂ where each of the points P of L₂ will be engaged to reach the equilibrium R_XF(P)=T_CF(P).

The 3rd Transformation (TR₃) will take place in the layer L₃ just beneath L₂ in the similar manner with the same dynamics as described for the layer L₂.

The successive transformations that take place towards the interior of the spinon follow the same pattern as long as they outside of the -virtual cylinder where T_CF(r)>R_XF(r) for r>.

For the interior of -virtual cylinder where the dominant tendency is R_XF, an expansion will take place until in the interior of the cylinder for every point P we have the equilibrium R_XF(P)=T_CF(P).

The end result, that emerges for this case b) is a complex one: its surface is a tensioned XB-surface with a dynamic interior as outlined above.

!

.

Regardless of the case involved (a or b), all spinons develop a tensioned XB-shell. The same is true for spinolons. And that is most significant since it follows that both spinolons and spinons from different MOLIs, upon collisions, will not be able to unite and generate additional formations. The only thing that will be resulted out of those off-CELI collisions is an increase of their spin. But that will imply that all spinons of Nature will vanish since their spin will increase indefinitely. (See, the FUTOS and the 1st PRITON of the previous section).

Well, not quite. There is a class type of collisions that do not generate spin --the CELI collisions. Thus spinons that are forming a CELI-line and travel along that line will form a new qualitatively MOLI-type called a MOLI-type of the 2nd tier or a secondary MOLI-type to be differentiated from an original, primeval MOLI-type whose objects are solely XB-masses. The original MOLI-types introduced could be called also the virgin MOLI-types or the primary MOLI-types. The secondary MOLIs can further be classified into the secondary MOLIs of the 1st order (made of spinolons and spinons), 2nd order, and so on.

A hierarchical structure among MOLI-types begin to emerge. We can talk about the MOLI-types of the 1st order (the virgin MOLIs), of the 2nd order (made of spinolons and spinons), and of higher orders (made of ultimate mega-formations called spinoverses).

A stunning grand cosmological picture of Nature begins to emerge where the Spin, and only the Spin, is responsible for the creation of the grand Perpetual Cycle of Nature (PECON), that in the simplest and most general terms, can be expressed as follows:

From various primal XB-blocks gliding in the limitless XV-space, some will collide generating spinning XF-objects --the spinolons and spinons that in addition to their spin had acquired linear translatory motions. Some of those spinning objects will be involved in head-on linear collisions that will generate by SUCO new mega-formations called spinoverses. Those spinoverses trough further off-CELI collisions will increase their spin continuously with each subsequent collision. Eventually, it will exist a moment called endall, when the magnitude of the spin will increase so much that it will break the tensioned XB-shell of the spinoverse that now is called endoverse. By the DUBs created, XB-blocks will emerge running away from each other radially as in an explosion.

.	.	So, to recapitulate, various mega-formations, called spinoverses, are being formed at various times and in various places in the limitless xenovoid (XV) space. Those spinoverses eventually will end up as endoverses whose maximum limit spins will generate their demise through the abrupt rupture of their xenobase shells. Those violent dismemberment of endoverses called the Big-Bangs of Nature (BBONs) release escaping XB-blocks that move radially, and with the same speed, in their respective linear trajectories. Those XB-blocks, called primal blocks of Nature (BONs), will generate new spinoverses of Nature that will end up as endoverses, completing therefore the grand Perpetual Cycle of Nature (PECON).
.		Remark: A Big-Bang of Nature (BBON) need not be confused with today's absurd, nilly-willy cosmological Big-Bang assumption that somehow our existing Universe has emerged out of some explosion of a point of infinite mass density. Endoverses are not points --in the mathematical sense-- but large formations that explode through a mechanism and cause outlined above.
.		As you have guessed, one of such spinoverse in Nature is our Universe that we live in.

So far, the spinon studied in case b) was considered to be a solid XF-block with no "holes" in it, i.e., with no holeons in it. But that omission was deliberate as a study of the holeon transformation in a spinon requires, for its paramount importance, a new section. We stumbled upon the formation of the minitron as being the end result of a holeon development in a particular simple case.

The variety of situations that the case b) provides for the study of holeon transformation will generate the variety of primeval particles of Nature (PPONs), and that, in itself, is a monumental recognition indeed.

Two distinct families of PPONs were able to be identified:

one, called rigidtron/hardtron; and the other, called gelotron/softron

Collectively, those two families of PPONs are incorporated into the masstron family. It is the study of masstrons that starts with the next section.

.